PDA

View Full Version : WOHVA & NMA sue State of WA


Tod701
10-05-2009, 10:51 AM
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:

Washington Off Highway Vehicle Alliance files lawsuit to block transfer of ORV funds to State Parks

Olympia, Washington – 5 October 2009

The Washington Off Highway Vehicle Alliance has teamed up with the Northwest Motorcycle Association to file a lawsuit against the State of Washington to block the transfer of over 9.5 million dollars in offroad vehicle funds from the Nonhighway and Offroad Vehicle Activities (NOVA) account to State Parks. Attorney James Buchal will be representing both organizations.

This spring the Legislature passed House Bill 1244, which transferred the money out of the NOVA account. The NOVA account money comes from the gas tax paid by offroad vehicle users and the license tab fees on offroad vehicles (ORV).

According to the Washington State Constitution gas tax collected must be used only for roads. To comply with that the state allows refunds on gas tax paid for other uses.

In 1972 the offroad vehicle community supported passage of legislation that waived their right to a direct refund of the taxes they paid for ORV fuel in exchanged for having those same funds “refunded” into a dedicated account to promote and protect their sport. Later on, their ORV license tab money was added to this account too. The NOVA program was established to administer these funds.

Now that all the money is going to State Parks and State Parks is not going to spend the money on offroad vehicle recreation, this is no longer a legitimate refund for the benefit of these taxpayers.

The NOVA funding is normally distributed by the State Recreation and Conservation Funding Board in the form of grants. These grants are awarded to governmental agencies such as the United States Forest Service, the Washington Department of Natural Resources and various counties. It is the primary source of funding for offroad vehicle recreation and for law enforcement on public lands in Washington.

If this funding is not returned to benefit the taxpayers that paid for it, families and their children throughout the State of Washington will lose the healthy, outdoor recreational opportunities they were promised and for which they paid their taxes and ORV tab fees, as the trails they have enjoyed together are closed. And public employees throughout Washington who maintain and patrol those trails will lose their jobs.

The Washington Off Highway Vehicle Alliance and the Northwest Motorcycle Association are nonprofit organizations dedicated to protecting and promoting off highway vehicle and offroad motorcycle recreation.

Tod Petersen
Political Action Committee Chairman – Washington Off Highway Vehicle Alliance
Legislative/Land Use Coordinator – Northwest Motorcycle Association
P.O. Box 61161
Seattle, WA 98141
tod701@aol.com
www.wohva.org
www.nmaoffroad.org

The Shocker
10-05-2009, 03:58 PM
Thanks for posting this up. I'm curious as to how the State knows how much gas I use in my bike in order to know how much gas tax should be put into that fund? It's not like farm equipment buying dirty diesel instead of highway taxed stuff.

Tod701
10-06-2009, 08:46 AM
I'm curious as to how the State knows how much gas I use in my bike in order to know how much gas tax should be put into that fund?

They did a couple of studies.
One back in the 70's extimated 4.6% of the gas was being used off road (including DNR and USFS roads). The Legislature chose at that time to allocate 1 % instead.

A few years ago the state paid for another study with similar results.
Unfortunately that study also researched the amount used in ORV versus the amount used on DNR and USFS roads. They sent questionaires to registered vehicle owners and compared the amount of fuel burned by non-ORV people driving to trailheads to hike, ride horses, etc and the amount of fuel burned in ORVs, totally ignoring the amount of fuel burned by ORV owners driving their tow rigs to trailheads on DNR and USFS roads. Thanks to that flawed methodology they determined that ORV owners deserve a smaller cut of the fuel tax refund.

The Shocker
10-06-2009, 02:09 PM
They did a couple of studies.
One back in the 70's extimated 4.6% of the gas was being used off road (including DNR and USFS roads). The Legislature chose at that time to allocate 1 % instead.

A few years ago the state paid for another study with similar results.
Unfortunately that study also researched the amount used in ORV versus the amount used on DNR and USFS roads. They sent questionaires to registered vehicle owners and compared the amount of fuel burned by non-ORV people driving to trailheads to hike, ride horses, etc and the amount of fuel burned in ORVs, totally ignoring the amount of fuel burned by ORV owners driving their tow rigs to trailheads on DNR and USFS roads. Thanks to that flawed methodology they determined that ORV owners deserve a smaller cut of the fuel tax refund.


I kinda figured however they did it they have screwed us in the end. :(

Tod701
10-24-2009, 08:31 AM
they have screwed us in the end. :(

Both ends :eek:

To correct some of this, support Representative Dan Kristiansen's efforts in the State legislature. The NMA and WOHVA will again be working with Dan to push ORV positive legislation in 2010.

It will be a tough job since 80 percent of the democrats in the legislature don't like us and they rule the place right now, but we are not quiters and won't go away.